Jy blaai in die argief vir Belasting.

Vet katte, vet gatte en arm gatte

April 17, 2013 in Belasting, Misdaad, RSA politiek

Ek gelees gereeld in die nuus hoe swart mense hulle broeke bevuil oor die ANC regime wat die koei melk sonder om aan hulle, die sogenaamde armes, te dink. Natuurlik doen die ANC dit, maar wat my regtig gruwelik demoer in maak is dat die kla gatte eintlik net wil deel in die koei se melk, of hulle dit verdien of nie.

Effektief gee hulle niks om wie die koei is, of aan wie die koei en die melk behoort nie. Is daai armes dan regtig enigsins meer regverdig of minder gulsig as die regime se vetgat, vet katte? Ek dink nie so nie.

Soos my Angolese vriend tereg opgemerk het: Swart mense soek verander in hul inkomste maar wil nie hulle maniere van werk, leef of spandeer verander nie. Die maklikste pad om dit te bereik is dus vir hulle om net met alle mag ook te probeer om die koei te melk…en as hulle ‘n gans sien, sommer die goue eiers te steel en die gans op te vreet.

Ongelukkig vir hulle is daar net te min koeie en ganse om hull tevrede te stel en die wat oor is sal een vir een padgee of planne maak om hulle besittings te beskerm.

 

Regering of maatskappy wat wins maak uit ons?

April 15, 2013 in Belasting, Misdaad, RSA politiek

Maak nie saak hoe ek daarna kyk nie, maar dis duidelik dat iewers groot fout is met wat ons as regering het of as regering sien. Die implikasies is groot as wat ek hier sien waar is. Wat ek wil weet is waar is die kontrak wat hulle het met my en waar en wanneer het ek dit geteken? Wie is die aandeelhouers en wie neem wins uit die maatskappy is die volgende vrae wat antwoorde moet kry.

Hoe lank nog….

April 4, 2013 in Belasting, Internasionale politiek, Misdaad, RSA politiek

Ciprus se regering is vasbeslote om sy mense te beroof, Nieu Zeeland beplan dieselfde, ja selfs Holland en Slovenie lyk of hulle ook binnekort groot K..K het wat hul fens gaan slaat….

Nou hoe lank nog voor ons in die nuwe RSA ook gaan deurloop?

Boodskap aan die (on)regstelsel se pikkewyne

Maart 14, 2013 in Belasting, Internasionale politiek, Misdaad, RSA politiek

Liewe Pikkewyne

Hiermee wil ek julle dalk so bietjie waarsku.

Met die dat daar al so paar van julle aan julle basse moes voel dat mense gatvol is vir julle en julle hele ou vrot reg stelsel, gaan lees gerus weer Bastiat se ‘The law” en sien of julle stelsel enigsins inpas by dit was ons, die vlees en bloed mense, nodig het. Ek  is oortuig ons kan maar net die sogenaamde “common law” of “law of the land” gebruik. Dit was vir baie jare al wat nodig was, tot die korporatiewe Zionisties geinspireerde commies besluit het om eerder ‘n stelsel van wettige roof in te stel.

http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/F-State-prosecutor-attacked-with-axe-20110210

http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Top-advocate-attacked-injected-at-court-20130314

Wat het ons meer nodig as die eeue oue reels:

“Doen net aan ander dit wat jy aan jouself gedoen wil he.”

“Doen net wat jy wil solank dit op niemand se regte inbreuk maak nie of niemand skade berokken nie”

“Wees eerlike in besigheid”

en as jy nie so maak nie dan sal ons(die jurie van jou medemense), jou straf.

Teveel mense word vandag beroof in howe, ja beroof want dis wat dit is as iemand se geld, goedere, huis  of vryheid afgevat word terwyl daar geen mens is wat skade of besering kan wys nie. Sogenaamde “victimless crimes” is wat die regering deur sy statute skep en julle lot speel en deel lekker saam in die hele gemors.

Ons, die meerdeheid wat vryheid lief het, het genoeg gehad en reg oor die aardbol span ons saam om ons ware vryheid te herwin. Julle sal moet kies aan wie se kant staan julle, ons die mense of die korporatiew regering wat geen gevoel of lewe het nie.

Http://www.oppt.co.za

“If there is ever a fascist takeover in America, it will come not in the form of storm troopers kicking down doors but with lawyers and social workers saying. “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”
― Jonah GoldbergLiberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning

Die nommer van die dier, ook die nommer van ‘n mens.

Maart 12, 2013 in Belasting, Internasionale politiek, Misdaad

Ek word geslag oor my idee dat die nommer wat die Bybel van praat, die een wat elke mens sal moet kry in die eindtyd, reeds aan elkeen van ons toegeken is. Die ding het relatief onlangs begin en vandag is elke mens omtrent genommer. Dis net ‘n kwessie van tyd voor daai “barcodeded” nommer dalk of op jou vel gaan moet pryk of dalk onder jou vel in ‘n rekenaarskyfie sal moet wees.

Dink daaroor, wat kan jy doen sonder jou ID nommer vandag? Net mooi Bokkeral.

Sover ek kan sien het die bronstydperk ou se vorospellings heel waar uitgekom.

Net vir Tina..hoekom ek banke so haat.

Maart 2, 2013 in Belasting, Misdaad, RSA politiek

How banks work…

Right, I am going to try explain a months of research as simply as I can.
1. A bank does not LEND money. I know you don’t believe me, but the money in your credit card, personal loan and home loan was never loaned to you. A bank cannot prove to you that they lent you money because THEY DID NOT DO IT. Ask them yourself if you don’t believe me.
2. So, where did the money come from? Well, you promised to pay the bank over a period of time. You made this promise in writing on a document called a promissory note. This document is kept by the bank for “safe keeping” and is extremely powerful and very valuable.
3. The bank took your valuable promissory note and recorded it as an asset on their books. Then they hit a few keys on a computer and HEY PRESTO – the money appeared. In other words, they took a piece of paper, signed by you in the form of a promissory note and “swapped” it for “bank money” which you can spend. The bank’s books are perfectly balanced and brand new money has now entered the economy.
4. Let me re-iterate this principle: YOU gave them a piece of paper made valuable by YOUR signature (“money of exchange”) and they converted this piece of paper into “money of account.” In other words, the first piece of paper that you gave them is the money they pretend they “lend” you! Yes Sir, you actually created your own credit.
Once you have got over the shock of this, now we move onto the next and completely separate transaction that takes place within a bank:
1. The bank asks you to deliver on your promise. But what promise? It is not a promise to pay back a loan because there was no loan. Your promise is nothing more than an emotional obligation to society which you put in writing.
2. The bank loses NOTHING if you don’t pay it back because there is nothing to pay back. I will say this again: THE BANK LOSES NOTHING IF YOU DON’T PAY YOUR LOAN BACK. People find this extremely difficult to believe. I don’t blame them because I originally felt the same way.

Pravin se storietjies suig…en hy is donners vervelig

Maart 1, 2013 in Belasting, Misdaad, RSA politiek

Sonder om snaaks te wees, ek dink Pravin se hele ou storietjie was eintlik een groot pot snot. Dit was net bedoel om die massas heppie te hou, vir die vampier elite bloed te laat aanhou vloei en die res wat werklik iets bydrae te beroof. Behalwe vir dit vind ek sy hele manier van optree vaal, vervelig en voorspelbaar. Smaak my deesdae is dit ANC beleid dat almal wat grootkoppe so oninspirerend as moontlik moet wees.

Nersa het, vol bravado, net 8% toegstaan an Eishbom en almal is besig om een of ander siek euforie te beleef. Ek wonder hoekom? In aggeneme hoe die ekonomie sukkel en gewone mense sukkel, moes die pryse eerder verlaag gewees het. Daar is geen manier wat enige verhoging van enige energie produkte tans moreel verdedigbaar kan wees nie. Die feit dat die regering so mildelik skep uit die produkte en dan 30+% van alles staatsinkomste verkwis, of sommer net steel, maak die hele ding net nog meer siek.

Hiermee verklaar ek nou dat ek Sasol en alle ander sogenaamde “convenience” winkels by vulstasies boikot. Hopelik sal baie mense dit doen en hulle dwing om die regering aan te vat oor brandstof pryse.

 

Genoeg is genoeg….kant en klaar,

 

FINISH!!!

 

Tax on graduates..a funny take!

Februarie 14, 2013 in Belasting, Misdaad, RSA politiek, Snaaksighede

“Yor worshipfull mistris the speeka, I propous that people with digreeses should be taxed as they are mostly white. That wiell make them think twise of being cleva!”- your honorable Good Comrade!

Now on a more serious note: What the hell are these idiots drinking, smoking or injecting?

2nd question to the bank, with explanation

Februarie 9, 2013 in Belasting, Misdaad

2. Please confirm that the bank actually possessed the money they claim to have lent me, prior to my loan being granted. In other words, did the bank physically have the money they lent me, prior to the money appearing in my account?
It is unlikely that your bank will answer this question. However, they may try to disguise the answer by using clever language, so read their answer very carefully.
If your loan was securitised, then the bank’s money was not used to fund the loan. Therefore, a legitimate loan between you and the bank may not exist. The bank could never admit this, because to do so would be to admit that there could not possibly be a loan agreement with you.
Even if your loan was not securitised, then the bank still cannot answer this question. Why? Because the bank did not loan you their own lawful money. Something you need to know about banking: banks do not “loan” money in the ordinary sense of the word. This is a tricky concept, and works like this:
Banks do not make loans. Instead, they “advance” or “extend” something called “credit.” This simply means that a magical facility is created that provides you with “money” that is made out of thin air. As hard as it is for you to accept this, the money loaned to you was simulated (ie virtual).
To illustrate: A customer deposits R100 into their bank. The bank then quickly makes nine photocopies of that R100. They lend those photocopies to nine people, charging interest on each of those so-called loans. Then, if the loan is not paid back with interest, they take away the assets pledged as security.
In reality banks do not use a photocopier, they use a computer. The loan amount is typed into the computer and, hey presto, “magical” money is created out of thin air. You think that this money is a loan, or debt so you feel obligated to pay it back. However, it was never actually lent to you in the first place.

Question 1 to the bank, complete with explanation

Januarie 27, 2013 in Belasting, Misdaad

1. Am I indebted to the bank right now? (Please answer yes or no).
Obvious question, right? Wrong. In fact, your bank may well refuse to answer it.
Here’s why: If your loan has been securitised, then you are no longer indebted to your bank. If you are not indebted to your bank, then in our opinion, the bank cannot take judgement against you.
A recent judgment in the US (one of many similar judgments since 2008) has ordered banks to pay out US$8.5billion to consumers because of banking fraud. This is almost identical to what NewERA is seeking.
In the case of securitisation, your legal position with the bank has changed. Did your bank disclose securitisation to you? Do you even know what it means? Probably not. Therefore, you should therefore seek recourse and together with NewERA we may follow the success of other countries.
Also, if the bank does answer “yes” to this question, and it turns out that your loan has been securitised, then it is our opinion that the bank has placed itself in a position of fraud and quite possibly perjury. This could lead to criminal action against the bank and possible recourse for you.