Bigots and difficult racial questions.

Maart 16, 2011 in Sonder kategorie

Former President Bill Clinton, June 22, 1998, before Portland State University said:

“In little more than 50 years there will be no majority race in the United States.  No other nation in history has gone through demographic change of this magnitude in so short a time.”

 The students at that meeting cheered when he said this, but would they still have cheered if he said:

 “The Jews are losing their majority in Israel”

 

Or perhaps that:

 “The Eskimos are becoming the minority in Alaska because of White migration into their native lands”

 

Or perhaps:

 “That blacks will soon be a minority in Namibia due to Germans numbers rising?”

Am I stirring for a fight? No, but these types of questions needs to be answered and faced.

The truth is not racism, nor hate and we need to live by that motto.

Blikskottel…always seeks truth above all else.

12 antwoorde op Bigots and difficult racial questions.

  1. Interesting questions, yes.

  2. Ons is almal een, of ons dit nou wil weet of nie….

  3. So what is your answer to these questions..surely you have though about things like this with all your experience?

  4. Een mensdom, maar verdeeld/anders op baie vlakke en met goeie rede.

  5. MojoWire het gesê op Maart 16, 2011

    Usually when you quote things out of context they sound bad. Clinton was speaking about immigration. You seem to get your ‘truth’ from a website called saveyourheritage, soz bud, no truth there, only distortions.

    What Clinton actually said was this:

    “Today, largely because ofimmigration, there is no majority race in Hawaii or Houston or New YorkCity. Within five years there will be no majority race in our largeststate, California. In a little more than 50 years there will be nomajority race in the United States. (Applause.) No other nation inhistory has gone through demographic change of this magnitude in so short atime.” (typo’s from source)

    Clinton was making the point that immigration revitalised cities, and that immigrants must work and uplift themselves through the chances that America provides.

    whole speech here:

    http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/New/html/19980615-12352.html

  6. I see exactly what he said and even how it’s sugarcoated, but fact remains that what he is pointing at is clearly that white USA will soon not be in control of the country they have buildt. The threat from him and many others do not go unnoticed and the Yanks I work with daily confirms this. Most white Americans hate their own counties immigration policies as they know what is happening, why and by whom it is orchestrated.

    The point here is that whites are being conditioned to accept that they should not be proud of who they are. There lots of evidence pointing to this and I can see this clearly.

    Point is still that there would have been no applause of the second two things came from his mouth….it says it all.

    Just some info on where all this hate of whites come from:

    “Israel Cohen, a leading Jewish Communist, in his A Racial Program For the Twentieth Century, wrote [in 1913]:

    ‘We must realize that our Party’s most powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding into consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have have been oppressed by the whites, we can mould them to the program of the Communist Party. In America, we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites , we will instill into the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America into our hands’.”

    …and if you want more…just ask!

  7. Ek stem saam.

  8. MojoWire het gesê op Maart 16, 2011

    Dude, like us, Americans are immagrants themselves technically. All of them, except the American Indians. All their ancestors were immigrants, and commited some of the wrost genocides in history on the Native Americans. Stole their land and dominated them for 300 years.

    Basically what Clinton is saying in the speech is that America needs immigrants to do the jobs Americans won’t. If he is sugar coating anything it is that.

    My point is that quoting it selectively misrepresents what he said. On that site it says it promotes ‘white genocide’ sound familiar? It should, its in our papers everyday…

    Do you know the protocals of zion? It was a fake document spread to discredit jews, that quote is from a similiar document.

    You got to quote credible stuff dude, I can’t work with that, soz.

  9. Whites were in America long before what you think and there is proof of this, ample proof. You just know what you have heard and been taught, but as always this is far from the truth.
    How is it that so many Phoenician scripts were found dating back to 1000’s of years before Christ? This is just one thing, but there are many other proofs as well, again which I will gladly supply.

    No, some more on the threats against whites:
    “Whiteness is a form of racial oppression”
    “The suggestion is that it is somehow possible to separate whiteness from oppression — and it is not.”

    “There can be no white race without the phenomenon of white supremacy.”

    — Professor Noel Ignatiev, Massachusetts School of Art

    Make no mistake, we know the truth when we see it and many Yankies are also waking up to the facts.

  10. Protocalls of Zion might not be fake.Infact there is a court decison, in England if I remeber right, that confirmed these are real, but that ruling has been hidden away deeply. The other interesting thing is that those protocalls can clearly be seen in what’s happening in the world. I can also give some info on that court ruling if you want. Personally, I have also doubted that such a plan could ever work, but these days I cannot ignore what i see happening.

    Found it:
    Great publicity was given throughout the world in 1935 to a decision in the Swiss Courts that the documents known as “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” were a forgery; that the judge had described the contents as “ridiculous nonsense”; and that the Protocols had been condemned as an offence against public morals.

    Even in remote New Zealand numerous newspapers at that time published long articles on what they termed an “Historic Forgery”; and addresses were similarly given over the radio system proclaiming loudly that the Protocols had been shown to be baseless.

    We are now at the end of February, 1938, but the writer can recall nothing in the daily papers, and he has heard nothing over the radio system, telling him that the Protocols verdict given on May 14, 1935, was reversed by the Berne Court of Appeal on November 1 last.

    When the decision went one way it was news fit for all the world to hear: a subject for special articles and radio broadcasts. When it went the other way it ceased to be news at all.
    February, 1938 EXAMINER

  11. MojoWire het gesê op Maart 16, 2011

    Lol, okay first Phoenicians weren’t white. They were closer to Arabs. People in Yemen and Lybia are closer to Phoenicians than people in Cyprus or Malta according to dna studies. The information is available on the internet, you just have to look.

    I can give you a link to phoenician reliefs, they look anything but european.

    If you have information on these scripts, i would like to see it sounds interesting.

    Ignatiev’s point is that the term white should be removed from society because it denotes priviledge. I think he would argue the same thing if blacks had unfair advantage because of their skin colour. I can’t see anything wrong with that.

    Once again you are just quoting him without saying what he is talking about — ie out of context.

  12. MojoWire het gesê op Maart 16, 2011

    dude but we know who wrote them, we have evidence of who wrote them, and it wasn’t jews.

    We also have evidence of the guy who wrote a racial plan for america. He was a anti-semetic author, one of the original conspiracy theorists who started this whole rockerfella/ jp morgan thing that zeitgeist talks about with the cenral bank.

    Nothing new there dude…

Laat 'n Antwoord

Jou e-posadres sal nie gepubliseer word nie. Vereiste velde word aangedui as *.